Process Route Fit Check

Machining is a subtractive process, so it is priced by the second. As soon as the shape of a part and the quantity required favour a forming process, the comparison stops being close. This check tells you which side of that line your part sits on — including when the answer sends the work away from us.

Your part

Which factors drove that verdict

    Route comparison

    What each route is actually good at
    RouteWhere it winsWhat it costs you
    High-volume CNC machiningTolerance-carrying features, metals, traceable material, design that may still movePriced by cycle second, so unit cost falls slowly once setup is amortised
    Casting or forgingThousands of pieces of a frozen metal design; near-net shape removes cutting timeTooling investment and a redesign cycle; machining still needed on critical faces
    StampingSheet-like profiles at high countsDie cost, and features that machine easily are not always easy to form
    Injection mouldingPolymer parts at larger run sizesTool cost is the whole argument; machining is only the bridge while the tool is cut
    Additive manufacturingComplex or conformal geometry at low countsNot a volume answer for steel and stainless part families
    If the check says machining, send the drawing and the release pattern. If it says otherwise, we would rather tell you now than two years into the programme. Talk to a Process Engineer About Your Volume →

    This is a directional read from the factors that drive process choice, not a quotation. Any switch away from machining needs the redesign checked rather than assumed, because a feature that cuts easily may not form or fill.